ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Effect of Acupuncture for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: Study Protocol for a Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP) is the most common chronic condition worldwide. Although recommended in several clinical guidelines, high-quality double-blind studies supporting the evidence for acupuncture remain limited. Objective: This study aims to test the efficacy of penetrating acupuncture for CNSLBP using double-blind needles that blind both the acupuncturist and the participant, which provides the most rigorous methodology for acupuncture trials to date. Methods: This study was a randomized double-blind (acupuncturist-patient) placebo-controlled trial conducted at the Tokyo Ariake University of Medical and Health Sciences Acupuncture Clinic. Seventy-five adult participants with CNSLBP were randomized to genuine penetrating, skin-touch placebo, and no-touch placebo needles that do not touch the skin. Consistent with prior studies and clinical practice, acupoints on the bladder meridian were mainly used. The study has 2 primary outcomes: an objective outcome and a subjective outcome. The primary objective outcome is the flexion-relaxation phenomenon, an index associated with low back pain, assessed using surface electromyography (sEMG) recordings of the bilateral lumbar erector spinae muscles and hamstrings. The primary subjective outcome is pain intensity measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) before and after the intervention. Results: The Ethics Committee approved the study protocol of Tokyo Ariake University of Medical and Health Sciences in April 2018 (approval number: 0246). This study started in July 2018 and was completed in March 2025. Conclusions: This trial used a double-blind design and objective outcome measures to rigorously evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture for CNSLBP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.