ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2026
Lived Experiences of Older Adults Using Wearables With Real-Time Feedback: Phenomenological Study.
Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWearable devices with real-time feedback (WRFs) provide increasing opportunities to enhance physical activity and improve rehabilitation through collecting and processing health-related data. Real-time feedback (RTF) from the device is expected to result in a more dynamic, coordinated, and synchronous rhythmic activity, defined as step-by-step movements mediated by the real-time heart rate feedback. However, age-specific characteristics in the user engagement with WRFs integrating real-time audio feedback have largely remained unexplored.
objectiveThis study explores the lived experiences of older adults using wearables with RTF to uncover motivations, aspirations, and hindering factors in their engagement with WRFs in rhythmic activity. The study explores narratives that older adults articulate in their previous use of wearables for physical activity, their experiences with WRFs during rhythmic activity, and their meaning-making of the interactive features enhancing the synchronization of the movement during rhythmic activity.
methodsThe study was conducted as a qualitative interview study with 18 older adults who used a WRF for rhythmic activity during a 3-week period in their home environment. The wearable used in the study is a chest-band sensor device that helps users to synchronize their steps with their heartbeat through the provision of real-time audio feedback. The material consists of semistructured interviews before and after using the device. Material from the semistructured interviews was analyzed with an interpretative phenomenological analysis method.
resultsThe study identified four main themes characterizing older adults' lived experiences with wearables, which are (1) use of wearable technologies without RTF in daily life, (2) embodied rhythmic negotiation with RTF, (3) interpretation of health data with RTF, and (4) temporal trajectories of device engagement with RTF. Older adults demonstrated intentional distancing from wearable technologies rather than simple disuse, prioritizing authentic bodily experiences over external validation. Their engagement was fundamentally relational, mediated through trusted social networks, and required dialogical support for data interpretation. Device-guided movement synchronization created contextually situated challenges that varied significantly based on environmental demands, individual bodily capacity, and exercise routines. Extended temporal engagement transformed participants' relationships with the technology from initial disruption to potential integration, with RTF serving as a bridge toward enhanced embodied awareness when carefully designed.
conclusionsThe study concludes that RTF from the device can enhance synchronization and bodily awareness, but meaningful engagement requires adaptive designs that respect older adults' authentic movement practices, accommodate their relational approach to technology validation, and allow sufficient time for embodied competency development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.