SynthesisEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2026
Differentiating the start of an exacerbation from day-to-day variation in people with COPD: a systematic review.
Synthesis in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCOPD symptoms occur with day-to-day variation. An exacerbation of COPD is a symptom worsening that exceeds these fluctuations and requires systemic treatment. Differentiating the start of an exacerbation from day-to-day disease variation is an unmet research need. We sought to examine the evidence that monitoring daily variation in COPD can differentiate this from the onset of an exacerbation.
methodsA systematic review was conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers and Cochrane databases, as well as a citation search, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eligible studies focused on monitoring daily symptoms and/or physiological parameters in stable COPD. Quality assessments were conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Findings were qualitatively synthesised, considering essential components.
results22 studies were included in the review. The definitions of exacerbation were diverse across studies. 14 (64%) of the included studies demonstrated that day-to-day variation in symptoms (
conclusionThis review summarises evidence on how day-to-day variation differs from the start of an exacerbation in COPD. The combination of continuous monitoring, reliable measurement tools and a refined algorithm, with personalised baseline and threshold values, yields promising results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.