Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42056343›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Deep learning-based breast cancer detection with customized ensemble attention.

Divyakant T Meva, Kalpesh Popat, Hirenkumar Kukadiya, Nikisha Jariwala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Divyakant T MevaFaculty of Computer Applications, Marwadi University, Rajkot, Gujarat, India. divyakant.meva@marwadieducation.edu.in.
Kalpesh PopatFaculty of Computer Applications, Marwadi University, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
Hirenkumar KukadiyaInstitute of Computer Science and Applications, Gandhinagar University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Nikisha JariwalaSmt. Tanuben & Dr. Manubhai Trivedi College of Information Science, Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, Surat, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer remains one of the leading malignancies globally, and accurate diagnostic decisions at the early stages of the disease can significantly improve patient prognosis. This paper introduces a new ensemble deep learning framework, combining three specific attention mechanisms tailored to the breast pathology domain, namely, Multi-Scale Channel Attention (MSCA), Spatial-Morphological Attention (SMA), and Hierarchical Dual Attention (HDA). Unlike generic SENet and CBAM mechanisms, these modules are specifically designed for breast pathology: MSCA captures nuclear-level channel statistics across multiple pooling scales, SMA applies learnable morphological gradient operators to tissue boundary regions, and HDA employs depth-dependent gating to dynamically balance spatial and semantic attention across network stages. While domain-adaptive attention has been explored in medical imaging, the specific combination of multi-scale nuclear statistics, learnable morphological gradients, and depth-adaptive gating tailored jointly to histopathological and mammographic imaging represents a distinct and novel architectural contribution. The framework incorporates three complementary CNN backbones (ResNet-50, DenseNet-121, and EfficientNet-B3) augmented with the proposed attention modules, and intelligently fuses their predictions using a confidence- and performance-based weighted ensemble strategy. Comprehensive experiments were conducted on three publicly available benchmark datasets: the BreakHis histopathology dataset (with 1,995 different images at 40× magnification), the BACH challenge dataset (with 400 WSIs producing 9,600 patches), and the CBIS-DDSM mammography dataset (with 2,620 cases). The proposed framework yields statistically significant (p < 0.05; paired t-test across five folds) improvements upon individual backbone constituents and surpasses attention-augmented baselines SENet and CBAM by up to 1.8 pp on BreakHis (95.6 ± 0.5% acc), BACH (91.3 ± 0.8% acc), and CBIS-DDSM (93.7 ± 1.0% acc) Ablation studies confirmed the contribution of each attention module (MSCA + 1.6%, SMA + 1.2%, HDA + 1.0%) individually, and a clinical reader study revealed that AI assistance significantly improved the accuracy of pathologists on more challenging cases (accuracy increasing from 85.4 to 90.2%; p = 0.012). Attention visualizations exhibited clinically meaningful attention overlap with pathologist-annotated ROIs (mean IoU = 0.76) compared to generic CBAM-based attention (IoU = 0.59).

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningConvolutional Neural NetworksFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMammographyBreakHis; BACHBreast cancerCBIS-DDSMCustomized attention mechanismsDeep learningEnsemble learningHierarchical Dual AttentionHistopathologyMammographyMulti-Scale Channel AttentionSpatial-Morphological Attention

Identifiers

PMID42056343
PMCPMC13319218

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.