ArticlePoultry science2026
Goslings with a reduced quality score can be reared as effectively as those with a full quality score in a semi-intensive production system.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare parameters influencing the rearing efficiency of geese that received either a full quality score or a reduced quality score on their first day of life. A sample of 480 birds was randomly selected from goslings assigned by hatchery staff to the full and reduced quality score categories, with 240 birds (120 males and 120 females) per group. Goslings were evaluated using several specific criteria: level of activity, navel area, presence of remaining yolk, development of legs, appearance of eyes and fluff, and status of the remaining membrane. Goslings in the full quality score group received the maximum total score of 100 points. Goslings in the reduced quality score group had lower scores, with abnormalities predominantly associated with the navel area (>90% of birds). Geese were assigned to six replicates of 80 birds each (40 birds with a full quality score and 40 birds with a reduced quality score) and reared in a semi-intensive production system until they reached 20 weeks of age. During the rearing period, body weight (BW) and mortality rate were monitored, and feed conversion ratio (FCR) was calculated. At 20 weeks of age, 72 geese (36 from each subgroup) were slaughtered and subjected to a comprehensive carcass analysis. The reduced quality score group exhibited a decelerated growth rate until approximately 5 weeks of age (P < 0.05). However, from 6 to 20 weeks of age, the BW of geese of both sexes in both experimental groups was comparable (P > 0.05). The reduced quality of goslings on the first day of life did not affect FCR or mortality over the entire rearing period. Female geese from the reduced quality score group had a higher proportion of leg muscles in BW and carcass weight (P = 0.002 and 0.016, respectively) and a lower proportion of intestines in BW (P = 0.038). The full and reduced quality score groups showed no significant differences in other carcass traits (P > 0.05). In conclusion, goslings classified by hatchery staff as second-grade quality, i.e., reduced health quality but not posing a direct threat to survival, can be successfully reared in a semi-intensive production system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.