Trial reportEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy2026
Effect of intensive blood pressure and blood glucose control on cardiovascular outcomes driven by reductions in cardiovascular death and nephropathy: win ratio analysis of ADVANCE trial.
Trial report in European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00145925 (ADVANCE - Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ADVANCE - Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron - MR Controlled Evaluation
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment effects in contemporary cardiovascular pharmacotherapy: determinants and interpretation.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2026Article
- The win ratio: a valuable addition to the toolbox of cardiovascular trialists.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThis study aims to re-analyse the ADVANCE (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation) trial using the win ratio approach to better understand the relative contributions of individual outcomes in a composite endpoint. METHODS AND
resultsWe applied an unmatched win ratio analysis to the 11 140 participants of the ADVANCE trial, comparing intervention and control groups for blood pressure and glucose control. Outcomes were prioritized hierarchically by severity: cardiovascular death, non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction, nephropathy, and retinopathy. The ADVANCE trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00145925. For blood pressure lowering, the perindopril-indapamide group had a win ratio of 1.11 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.22, P = 0.028] compared to placebo and a net benefit of 1.5% (95% CI 0.2%-2.8%) for a number needed to treat (NNT) of 68 patients. For intensive glucose control, the win ratio was 1.10 (95% CI 1.01-1.20, P = 0.027) compared to standard glucose control with a net benefit of 1.6% (95% CI 0.2%-3.0%) for a NNT of 63 patients. When both interventions were combined, the win ratio increased to 1.19 (95% CI 1.04-1.35, P = 0.010) and the NNT decreased to 41 patients. Cardiovascular death and nephropathy were the main contributors to the observed benefits.
conclusionThe win ratio approach confirms the robustness of the original ADVANCE findings while providing a more detailed understanding of the relative importance of individual outcomes. This method enhances the interpretation and communication of composite endpoint analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.