ArticleBMC microbiology2026
Response of rhizosphere bacterial and fungal communities to reduced light intensity in tomato plant.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Light-Root Microbiome Interactions in Vegetable Crops: From Photoreceptor Signaling to Exudate-Mediated Recruitment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn protected vegetable cultivation, shading is commonly used to alleviate high light stress by reducing light intensity. However, the effects of shading on the structure and composition of soil microbial communities remain unclear.
methodsTo compare the effects of no-shading and shading conditions on bacterial and fungal communities in the tomato rhizosphere, high-throughput sequencing was performed on the 16S rRNA gene and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) amplicons.
resultsThe results showed that the alpha diversity of the fungal community and the Shannon index of bacteria were reduced by shading. The relative abundances of photoautotrophic microorganisms (such as the phylum Cyanobacteria and its class Cyanophyceae) was significantly reduced, while the relative abundance of the class Agaricomycetes was significantly increased. Notably, shading increased the relative abundances of microbial groups known to be associated with plant performance and soil nutrient transformation, such as Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas, and Mortierella. In contrast, the relative abundance of the potential plant pathogenic fungus Gibberella decreased.
conclusionOverall, shading altered the composition of the tomato rhizosphere microbial community by enriching specific groups while inhibiting potential pathogenic and photoautotrophic microorganisms. This study investigated the response of rhizosphere microorganisms to shading from a microbiological perspective, providing a scientific basis for optimizing light environment management in facility cultivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.