ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Early emergency department decision support for heart failure hospitalization using triage-level unstructured and structured data: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly identification of patients at risk for heart failure (HF) hospitalization in the emergency department (ED) is challenging because definitive diagnostic tests are often unavailable at triage. Chief complaint narratives contain rich symptom information but are rarely leveraged for early risk stratification. We sought to develop and validate a machine learning model that predicts HF hospitalization using only data available at ED intake, including free-text chief complaints and structured triage variables.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 270,596 adult ED-to-inpatient encounters across a large integrated health system (2016-2021). The primary outcome was HF hospitalization, defined by a primary discharge diagnosis of HF. Predictors were limited to triage-available data: demographics, vital signs, comorbidity burden, and free-text chief complaints. Chief complaint text was transformed using term frequency-inverse document frequency and latent semantic analysis, supplemented by clinically defined symptom phenotypes. Logistic regression and light gradient boosting machine (LGBM) models were trained and evaluated on a held-out test set. Model performance was assessed using discrimination, calibration, and precision-oriented thresholds.
resultsHF hospitalization occurred in 7.5% of encounters. Models incorporating both structured and natural language processing-derived features achieved the highest performance. The combined LGBM model demonstrated strong discrimination (AUC = 0.896), recall (0.816), and precision (0.630 at the default threshold), outperforming structured-only and NLP-only models. Symptom clusters related to dyspnea and edema were among the strongest predictors.
conclusionHF hospitalization can be accurately predicted at ED presentation using only triage-available data. Integrating free-text chief complaints with structured variables substantially improves early risk stratification and may support earlier diagnostic evaluation and resource planning in acute care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.