Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42057189›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026

"It's never just one thing": understanding risk factors for sports injuries in track and field.

Kalani Weerasinghe, Ranil Jayawardena, Indu Nanayakkara, Andrew P Hills

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kalani WeerasingheSchool of Health Sciences, UTAS Health, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia. kalani.weerasinghege@utas.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9314-9714
Ranil JayawardenaDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7352-9365
Indu NanayakkaraDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Kandy, Sri Lanka.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0819-4239
Andrew P HillsSchool of Health Sciences, UTAS Health, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7787-7201

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrack and field athletes are vulnerable to injury due to numerous intrinsic and extrinsic factors, such as previous injuries, high training loads, inadequate recovery, and psychological stress. However, there is limited information about the lived experiences of athletes from low- and middle-income countries.

objectiveThis study aimed to explore perceptions of risk factors for sports injuries among Sri Lankan track and field athletes and key stakeholders.

methodsThis qualitative study employed convenience sampling to recruit elite athletes, their parents, and diverse stakeholders, including doctors, physiotherapists, coaches, sports administrators, and academics. Face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsThirty-two participants completed the study (12 athletes, 17 stakeholders, and 3 parents). Five overarching themes related to injury occurrence and persistence were apparent among participants, including: (i) recurrent injuries due to inadequate recovery and load management; (ii) nutritional deficits, limited recovery, and psychological stress increasing vulnerability; (iii) environmental and equipment limitations elevating biomechanical load and fatigue-related risk; (iv) fragmented injury-management pathways and non-standardised return-to-play decisions; and (v) minimal injury monitoring and documentation, which limited prevention and continuity of care. Lower-limb injuries were most common, often associated with high training loads, poor recovery, technique errors, suboptimal ground conditions, and unsuitable equipment. Stakeholders highlighted nutrition, hydration, recovery strategies, and mental stress as key contributors. Injury management was inconsistent, with many athletes self-managing or relying on coaches rather than multidisciplinary healthcare. Formal surveillance systems were largely absent, prompting stakeholder calls for a coordinated digital record-keeping approach.

conclusionsSports injury prevention and management in Sri Lanka are constrained by limited facilities, suboptimal nutrition and recovery practices, and insufficient injury monitoring systems. Addressing these challenges requires integrated, multidisciplinary strategies that strengthen nutrition, recovery, psychological support, and record-keeping systems to optimise athlete health and performance.

Indexed as

Athletic stakeholdersInjury risk factorsInjury surveillanceSports injuriesTrack and field

Identifiers

PMID42057189
PMCPMC13274209

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.