ArticleJournal of diabetes research2026
Health Service Leaders' Perspectives on Type 1 Diabetes Models of Care for Children and Young Adults in Australia: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health Service Leaders' Perspectives on Type 1 Diabetes Models of Care for Children and Young Adults in Australia: A Mixed-Methods Study.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionType 1 diabetes (T1D) is a lifelong condition typically diagnosed in childhood. Clinical practice guidelines recommend comprehensive multidisciplinary team (MDT)-based care led by paediatric endocrinologists. However, experiences and opinions of health professionals about the implementation of T1D MDTs in Australia are currently unknown.
aimsTo describe health service teams caring for children and youth with T1D in Australia and to identify opportunities for service improvements from providers' perspectives.
methodsMixed-methods study co-designed with clinicians and consumers, including a survey of clinic leaders and semi-structured interviews. Survey questions covered modes of care delivery, team composition and outreach. Interview transcripts were thematically analysed using a hybrid inductive/deductive approach.
resultsThirty-two T1D services leaders completed the survey; 16 were from major cities and 16 were from regional/rural areas across all Australian states and territories. The services provided care for ~51% of all <19-year-olds living with T1D. T1D services were multidisciplinary and commonly included dieticians (n = 29, 94%), nurse diabetes educators (n = 22, 71%) and general paediatricians (n = 21, 68%). Eight (29%) services had a dedicated psychologist. A quarter (25%) of regional/rural services had a paediatric endocrinologist compared with 100% of major city services (χ
conclusionThis mixed-methods study is the first Australia-wide exploration of T1D models of care that describes care provision from the clinicians' perspectives. A need exists to address current gaps to achieve the recommended MDT models of care for T1D. Understanding existing models of care will be essential to determine the future impacts of changes in policies, therapies and demands on paediatric T1D services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.