ArticlePublic health nutrition2026
Quantifying the availability of hyper-palatable foods in US food stores and household purchasing behaviour.
Article in Public health nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveHyper-palatable foods (HPF) have strong reinforcing properties, and their presence in food stores may skew purchasing towards HPF, even when healthier foods are available. However, the availability of HPF in US food stores is unknown. The study aims were to (1) quantify the prevalence of HPF in US stores; (2) characterise US household expenditures on HPF per shopping occasion and (3) examine demographic and health characteristics associated with HPF purchasing.
designProprietary scanner data representing (1) foods available and sold in US food stores and (2) foods purchased during US household shopping occasions were analysed across 4 years (2015-2018).
settingN/a.
participantsUS food stores (> 34900 per year) provided weekly data on all foods/beverages available and sold. Samples of US households (> 45000 per year) used scanners to report all food/beverage purchases during their shopping occasions.
resultsAcross years, HPF comprised over two-thirds of foods available per store (M = 67·1 %; sd = 6·9) and of weekly sales (M = 70·4 %; sd = 9·0). HPF comprised the majority of foods purchased by households (M = 59·4 %; sd = 34·6) and on average accounted 60·3 % of household food expenditures (sd = 35·7) per shopping occasion. Health risk characteristics including self-reported type 2 diabetes diagnosis and self-reported obesity diagnosis were associated with significantly higher proportionate expenditures on HPF, relative to those without such diagnoses (beta values = 1·412-1·584;
conclusionsHPF comprised > 65 % of available foods in US food outlets. Household purchasing of HPF during shopping occasions closely paralleled HPF availability in stores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.