ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Association between metabolic syndrome and incident stroke: insights from the UK Biobank.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of metabolic abnormalities associated with increased cardiovascular risk. This study examined the association between MetS and incident stroke in the UK Biobank. Methods: This population-based prospective cohort study included 329,887 participants free of stroke at baseline. MetS was defined as the presence of at least three of the following components: elevated waist circumference, elevated blood glucose, elevated blood pressure, elevated triglycerides, and reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Incident all-cause stroke was identified using hospital inpatient records, death registries, and self-reported data, whereas ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke were identified using hospital records and death registries only. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the associations of MetS, its individual components, and the number of MetS components with incident stroke. Results: Over a median follow-up of 14.1 years, 6,716 incident stroke cases were recorded. MetS was associated with a higher risk of incident all-cause stroke (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.28-1.42) and ischemic stroke (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.41-1.60), but not hemorrhagic stroke (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.96-1.20). Stroke risk increased with the number of MetS components. All individual MetS components were significantly associated with incident all-cause stroke, with elevated blood pressure showing the strongest association. Conclusion: MetS was significantly associated with incident all-cause stroke and ischemic stroke, but not hemorrhagic stroke, in this UK population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.