Evidence mapPaperPMID 42058713Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026

Integrating patient-reported weight gain cause narratives into personalized obesity management: a data-driven approach with natural language processing and machine learning.

Miksa M Henkrich, Maitane Nuñez-Garcia, Ignacio Sajoux, Begoña de Cuevillas, Juan José López-Gómez, J Alfredo Martínez, Daniel de Luis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Miksa M HenkrichPrecision Nutrition and Cardiometabolic Health Group, IMDEA Nutrition Institute, Campus of International Excellence (CEI) UAM+CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Maitane Nuñez-GarciaMedical Department, Pronokal Health Group, Barcelona, Spain.
Ignacio SajouxMedical Department, Pronokal Health Group, Barcelona, Spain.
Begoña de CuevillasPrecision Nutrition and Cardiometabolic Health Group, IMDEA Nutrition Institute, Campus of International Excellence (CEI) UAM+CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Juan José López-GómezDepartment of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Medicine School, Center of Investigation of Endocrinology and Nutrition (IENVA), Hospital Clínico Universitario, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
J Alfredo MartínezPrecision Nutrition and Cardiometabolic Health Group, IMDEA Nutrition Institute, Campus of International Excellence (CEI) UAM+CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Daniel de LuisDepartment of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Medicine School, Center of Investigation of Endocrinology and Nutrition (IENVA), Hospital Clínico Universitario, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Life course factors play an important role in the multifactorial etiology of obesity, yet quantitative analysis of patient-originated, unstructured weight gain cause narratives remains a challenge. This study automated the thematic labeling of such narratives with a large language model to assess the clinical relevance of patient-reported weight gain cause data in weight loss prediction and patient phenotyping. Subjects and methods: A total of 2,463 patients with overweight or obesity shared open weight gain cause narratives prior to starting a multidisciplinary medical-nutritional weight loss treatment, followed until reaching a pre-defined weight loss target or dropout. Narratives were labeled using 12 thematic categories in a GPT4.1 large language model. Associations of reported causal themes with age, sex, BMI class and treatment outcomes were evaluated using group-wise statistical comparisons and a Random Forest classifier. Weight gain cause co-occurrence patterns were modeled with a direct association network and pairwise risk ratio analyses. A partitional unsupervised clustering model integrating age, sex, baseline BMI and weight gain cause themes was designed to elucidate patient phenotypes defined by reported weight gain trajectories. Cluster-specific outcomes were compared using descriptive tests and linear mixed models. Results: Mean weight loss was 9.2 ± 6.8% over 108.6 ± 111.6 days. Automated weight gain narrative categorization achieved precision and recall of 0.906 and 0.897 against a reference sample. Reported weight gain causes were associated with age and sex but not BMI class. Associations between attributed causes and treatment outcomes were moderate, while between individual causes, strong associations were found. Disrupted schedules, mental health and external circumstances increased the risk ratio of unhealthy eating habits [3.65 (2.63-5.65), 2.16 (1.89-2.48), 1.51 (1.25-1.81) respectively], while medical issues and external circumstances increased physical inactivity risk [1.58 (1.31-1.90), 1.49 (1.23-1.82)]. Based on weight gain cause reports, age, sex and BMI class, seven clusters were identified with different demographic, clinical, treatment outcome and adherence characteristics. Conclusion: Patient-reported weight gain narrative analysis can be accurately automated using large language models, providing clinically relevant insights into obesity heterogeneity. While individual causes show modest associations with weight loss, their combined patterns allow the identification of distinct behavioral phenotypes with differential treatment responses. Integrating patient narratives into data-driven frameworks supports a more precise, person-centered obesity management.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemedical nutritional—pharmacological therapyobesityobesity phenotypespatient perspectivepersonalized nutritionVLCKD—VLEKTweight gain

Identifiers

PMID42058713
PMCPMC13123420

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.