ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Soybean root elongation in relation to water and mechanical stresses in intact and disturbed structures of an Oxisol.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Process-based root growth simulation models detail soil-root interactions, but do not incorporate the role of soil structure dynamics. Our objective was to parameterize the soybean root elongation under mechanical and hydric stress levels for soybean roots grown in soil with preserved (Field) and packed structure (Packed). Methods: In a long-term field experiment under the no-tillage system, soil samples from an Oxisol with preserved and non-preserved structures were used to evaluate soybean root growth responses. Soil samples with non-preserved structure were reconstructed with under six bulk densities (1.02; 1.10; 1.18; 1.26; 1.34; 1.42 Mg m Results: Field structure exhibited superior performance under conditions of high physical constraints, particularly in scenarios of elevated soil penetration resistance. An increase in soil penetration resistance from 1 MPa to 3.5 MPa resulted in a 52% reduction in relative root elongation under Field structure conditions, whereas in packed samples this reduction was more pronounced, reaching 74%. Under conditions of low soil penetration resistance (0.5 MPa) and a water saturation degree of 60%, relative soybean root elongation in packed samples was 29% higher than in field structure. However, the relative elongation between both structural conditions became similar as soil penetration resistance increased to 1.3 MPa. Furthermore, under near-saturation conditions (i.e., 90%), soybean root elongation in field structure was nearly three times higher than that estimated in packed samples. Discussion: Soil structure drives biophysical soil-root interactions, mitigating mechanical (soil penetration resistance) and hydric (degree of saturation) stresses on soybean root elongation under no-tillage, confirming our hypothesis via a semi-empirical model. Field structure under no-tillage facilitates root elongation through pore network, enhancing tolerance to water excess and deficit versus packed conditions. Degree of saturation provides practical water stress assessment, linked to soil penetration resistance via Busscher equation, capturing non-linear interactions for soybean root elongation responses to soil physical stresses. Incorporating soil structure effects into simulation models enhances root growth prediction, supporting effective agricultural practices under soil conservation management systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.