SynthesisPublic health nutrition2026
Nutrition items regulated by school nutrition policies in the USA and academic performance: a review of the non-policy literature.
Synthesis in Public health nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis systematic review synthesises existing research on the relationship between dietary intake - specifically concerning food and beverage items promoted or restricted by US federal school nutrition policies - and child academic performance, a salient predictor of long-term health.
designWe used keywords to search three databases. Along with other inclusion criteria, studies had to assess and report (i) a measure of intake of food groups/nutrient promoted or restricted by US school nutrition policies; (ii) a measure of academic performance and (iii) a measure of the association between both.
resultsWe identified thirty-nine studies, all of which utilised observational designs, and seven of which were considered higher quality based off the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-sectional Studies, published by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Thirty-five studies reported evidence that children had better academic outcomes when they had an increased intake of food groups and nutrient items promoted by school nutrition policies and/or a decreased intake of the food groups and nutrient items limited by school nutrition policies.
conclusionThese findings suggest that food groups and nutrient items governed by or promoted in school nutrition policies may shape children's learning and contribute to downstream social determinants of health. Research on the population-level influences of school nutrition policies on children's academic outcomes is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.