ArticleOtolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2026
Noise, Hearing, and Communication in the Operating Room: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Article in Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate noise-related communication barriers in the operating room and to identify strategies for overcoming them. STUDY
designCross-sectional mixed-methods survey.
settingTertiary academic medical center.
methodsAn anonymous 21-item electronic survey was distributed to operating room personnel, including surgeons, anesthesiologists, residents, medical students, nurses, and allied health professionals. Items assessed hearing difficulties, baseline hearing loss, communication barriers, coping strategies, and intervention preferences. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression; open-text responses underwent thematic analysis.
resultsAmong 225 survey respondents 80.4% (181/225) reported difficulty hearing in the OR and 14.7% (33/225) reported difficulty every case. All respondents with suspected or confirmed hearing loss reported hearing difficulty during surgery. Respondents with ≥5 years of OR exposure had higher odds of diagnosed hearing loss versus <5 years (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.2-7.9; P = .024); there was no association by age (P = .89). Among hearing aid users, 88% struggled to understand speech in the OR. Communication was most challenging in orthopedic cases (31%), with environmental noise sources (suction, drills, music, alarms) frequently cited (29%), and during robotic surgery (24%). Common self-accommodations included asking for repetition, anticipating steps, environmental adjustments, and positioning. Qualitative themes emphasized challenges arising from ambient noise, physical barriers, and psychosocial factors such as hierarchy or lack of psychological safety.
conclusionNoise-related hearing and communication barriers were reported across all OR roles. Interventional studies are needed to assess the role of acoustic, cultural, and technological strategies for overcoming hearing barriers and promoting effective teamwork.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.