ArticleHealth economics review2026
Has volume-based procurement reduced household catastrophic health expenditure in rural patients with chronic disease?-Evidence from CHARLS 2018 and 2020 in China.
Article in Health economics review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe volume-based procurement aims to reduce drug prices, alleviate the burden of medical costs on residents, and improve public health and well-being.
methodThis study uses data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) to evaluate the impact of Volume-Based Procurement (VBP) on household catastrophic health expenditures (CHE) among rural patients with chronic diseases. A household-level difference-in-differences (DID) model is constructed, and PSM-DID is applied to control for potential selection bias. The analysis further examines heterogeneous effects across regions and population subgroups, and explores the potential mediating role of health service utilization.
resultsThe baseline DID estimates indicate that VBP is associated with a reduction of approximately 3.33% points in the probability of household CHE, corresponding to a reduction of about 13-14% relative to the average CHE incidence of 24.65%. The PSM-DID robustness checks yield broadly consistent results. Heterogeneity analyses show that the policy effect is strongest among households in central and western regions, elderly households, and households without a spouse. Mechanism analysis suggests that health service utilization does not constitute a significant mediating channel, implying that the reduction in CHE is unlikely to operate through changes in healthcare utilization.
conclusionsThe findings suggest that the VBP policy may help reduce the risk of catastrophic health expenditures among rural households with chronic disease patients and contribute to alleviating household medical financial burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.