ArticleJournal of neurology2026
Factors influencing accelerated progression in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- External validation of an integrative model of functional impairment in early-stage behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD).Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Multimodal Correlates of Longitudinal Functional Decline in Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia (bvFTD).Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
50 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThis study aimed to identify neuropsychiatric, motor, and cognitive features associated with accelerated disease progression in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD).
methods192 participants were classified as having mild or moderate disease severity based on CDR + NACC FTLD global scores, with scores of 0.5 or 1.0 defined as mild (n = 106) and 2.0 as moderate (n = 86). Participants were further categorized as having accelerated (mild: n = 35; moderate: n = 32) or non-accelerated (mild: n = 71; moderate: n = 54) progression rates based on change in CDR + NACC FTLD-SB sum of boxes (SB) scores (≥ 3.5 points) between Visit 1 and 2. Random forest modeling and logistic regression identified features most predictive of accelerated progression within each group.
resultsIn mild bvFTD, episodic memory impairment and presence of frontal-behavioral neuropsychiatric symptoms were predictive of accelerated progression, whereas in moderate bvFTD, language impairments and motor signs were the strongest predictors. Identified features improved prediction of accelerated progression beyond demographic and clinical factors in mild (∆R2 = .22, p < 0.001) and moderate bvFTD (∆R2 = 0.11, p = 0.08) but did not achieve statistical significance in the moderate group. DISCUSSION: Distinct clinical profiles predict accelerated progression in mild versus moderate bvFTD, underscoring the importance of stage-specific clinical markers for prognosis and care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.