Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42060539›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

Digital Health Interventions for Family Members of ICU Patients: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Tanya Abenaim, Dan Poenaru, Michael Goldfarb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tanya AbenaimFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7721-8290
Dan PoenaruDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6267-6140
Michael GoldfarbDivision of Cardiology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Office E-212, 3755 Cote Ste Catherine Road, Montreal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada, 1 514-340-8222.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9790-1232

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlabelled: A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials evaluating digital health interventions for family members of intensive care unit (ICU) patients found no significant improvements in anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress, quality of life, or communication quality. Rather than concluding that digital approaches are inherently ineffective, we argue that these null findings reflect identifiable and remediable limitations in intervention design, outcome measurement, and trial methodology. In this commentary, we examine four structural barriers that currently constrain the evidence base and outline the conditions that next-generation trials must meet to adequately address the questions raised by this review.

Indexed as

FamilyIntensive Care UnitsDigital HealthDigital MediaHumansQuality of Lifedigital health interventionsfamily engagementintensive care unitsPICS-Fpost-intensive care syndrome-family

Identifiers

PMID42060539
PMCPMC13131828

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.