SynthesisDrug and alcohol dependence2026
Association between state cannabis laws and opioid outcomes: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThrough increasing cannabis availability, state cannabis legalization has been posited as one potential solution to the opioid crisis by providing an alternative to long-term opioid use for treating chronic pain. Forty U.S. states have legalized cannabis for medical use and 25 for recreational use. We systematically reviewed the literature to investigate the relationship of state medical and recreational cannabis legalization (MCL and RCL, respectively) to rates of opioid prescriptions, nonmedical use, opioid use disorder (OUD), opioid-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits, and overdose deaths.
methodsWe searched EconLit, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science Core Collection for English-language studies published through 10/21/25 that estimated MCL or RCL enactment effects on opioid outcomes compared to states that did not enact such laws. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023416119.
findingsOf 43 eligible studies, 18 investigated MCL, 11 investigated RCL, and 14 investigated both. Findings on MCL, RCL and opioid prescribing were mixed. No study found decreases in non-medical opioid use after MCL enactment; only one study found decreased non-medical use after RCL enactment. No studies found that MCL or RCL decreased OUD. MCL enactment was associated with lower opioid overdose mortality rates in earlier but not more recent studies; studies of RCL and opioid overdose fatalities had inconsistent results. INTERPRETATIONS: The mixed study findings suggest that MCL and RCL are just two factors in a complex set of influences on opioid outcomes that require further study. Meanwhile, cannabis legalization should not be considered an effective policy for curbing the opioid epidemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.