ArticleJournal of human hypertension2026
Need to take action for hypertension: insights from primary care blood pressure practices in Greece.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary healthcare (PHC) physicians play a pivotal role in the diagnosis and management of hypertension. While guidelines suggest that blood pressure (BP) should be measured in every patient visit at PHC units, the few studies conducted among PHC physicians report a low ratio of BP measurements in PHC settings. Data on PHC physicians' practices concerning BP measurement in Greece are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the practices of PHC physicians regarding BP measurement in Greece. A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted among PHC physicians across Greece. A total of 284 PHC physicians completed the questionnaire and 282 responses were included in the analysis, 42.9% male, 92.9% General Practitioners, 89.4% working in the public sector, with a median of 25 (17 - 30) daily patient visits. PHC physicians reported measuring BP in 33.3% (20-50%) of their patients and recommending home BP measurements in 31.1% (SD: 24.3%) of them. Among those who measured BP, 22.3% measured it once, 44.7% measured it twice, and only 21.3% measured it three times, while 54.6% used an electronic upper arm BP monitor. The main barriers reported were high daily patient volume (60.5%), together with limited time available with patients (69.5%), while only 1.3% declared insufficient training. This is the first study in Greece investigating the practices of PHC physicians regarding BP measurements. Our findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to improve BP monitoring practices. Education and motivation of physicians and other primary care team members would be fundamental in addressing the challenge of implementing BP measurement recommendations in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.