ArticleBMC primary care2026
Understanding patterns of behavioral health referrals for chronic disease in integrated care settings.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultiple chronic conditions affect one quarter of Americans, with prevalence rising to 75% among those aged 65 and older. Early identification of behavioral comorbidities and the integration of behavioral health (BH) interventions are associated with improved outcomes, yet BH integration remains non-standard in primary care settings.
methodsSecondary data analysis examining behavioral health (BH) referral patterns across four primary care clinics with integrated BH care. Adult patients (18 +) with a BH referral and/or a diagnosis of one or more chronic condition(s) are included. Relevant metrics are summarized using raw numbers, proportions, means/medians, odds ratios, and incidence rate ratios.
resultsA total of 31,317 patients and 13,157 BH referrals were included for analysis. 47% (n = 6,135) of referrals were submitted for patients with at least one chronic condition, yet only 9% (n = 1,170) specifically indicated medical condition management as the primary reason for the referral. Treatment initiation rates were relatively high (57%) among referred patients, with a median referral-to-completion time of 32 days. The majority of patients with one or more chronic conditions received no behavioral health referral (85%, n = 22,358). Compared with White/Non-Hispanic patients, African American and American Indian/Alaska Native patients had higher odds of a chronic condition with a BH referral than a chronic condition alone (OR = 1.2 and 2.0, respectively). Hispanic patients had higher odds of a BH referral alone or with a chronic condition (OR = 1.2 and 1.3, respectively) than a chronic condition alone compared to their Non-Hispanic counterparts, as did females compared to males (OR = 1.6). Patients with behavioral elements had higher overall healthcare utilization (IRR = 1.8) and were more likely to have COPD, weak/failing kidneys, arthritis, and hepatitis (OR = 1.8, 1.6, 1.4, and 1.4, respectively).
conclusionsOur findings suggest significant underutilization of integrated behavioral health services for chronic condition management, despite high treatment initiation rates among referred patients. Results highlight important differences in referral patterns based on specific demographic characteristics. Significant differences suggest that the added burden of behavioral elements is more likely to affect certain minority groups in our sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.