ArticleNutrition journal2026
Coffee consumption in relation to circadian syndrome in US population: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Nutrition journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCircadian syndrome (CircS) was recently proposed and referred to several common chronic diseases that showed a tight association with circadian disruption.
methodsThis study included 15,594 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey during 2003-2020. Survey-weight regression was used to examine the relationship between coffee consumption and CircS in the US population. Potential confounders were adjusted in the analysis. Mediation analysis was conducted to explore the mediating role of serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in the above relationship.
resultsAfter multivariate adjustment, participants with coffee consumption between one and two cups/day had significant reductions in CircS (OR: 0.976 with 95% CI: 0.960, 0.992) and CircS-related components (β: -0.121 with 95% CI: -0.184, -0.058) compared with those did not consumed coffee. Age, education level, and the ratio of family income to poverty showed interaction with coffee consumption on CircS and/or its components (P
conclusionsOverall, coffee consumption was negatively associated with the risk of CircS and CircS-related components among the US population, and the associations were modified by age, education level, and household income but mediated by decreased serum ALP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.