ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Derivation and Validation of a Predictive Model for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia Among Average-Risk Adults in China.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Leveraging Minimal Variables for Maximal Screening Yield: A Global Equity Perspective on Colorectal Cancer Risk Stratification.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As the burden of colorectal cancer (CRC) continues to rise and current screening methods have limitations in efficiency and accuracy, there is an urgent need particularly in China and other large populations to develop and validate precision risk prediction models based on individual risk factors with improved discrimination and generalizability to optimize the allocation of screening resources. Asymptomatic individuals aged 40-74 years were recruited from multiple hospitals in China, between January 2024 and May 2025. All participants completed a standardized questionnaire, physical measurements, and colonoscopy. A multivariable logistic regression model was derived to predict the risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia (AN), and a scoring system was derived from regression coefficients. Model performance was evaluated using discrimination, calibration, and risk stratification ability. Among 9617 participants, 673 AN cases were identified. The final model included six variables: age, gender, smoking, drinking, chronic appendicitis, and hypertension. The model demonstrated acceptable discriminatory ability (c-statistics: 0.656 internal validation) and good calibration. A scoring system (range: 0-37) classified individuals into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. AN prevalence for each group was 3.46%, 6.25%, and 11.48%, respectively. The number needed to screen (NNS) improved significantly from 28.9 in the low-risk group to 8.7 in the high-risk group. The prediction model and scoring system developed enable effective risk stratification and are suitable for individualized assessment prior to colonoscopy in resource-limited settings, thereby improving screening efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.