Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42063357›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026

Derivation and Validation of a Predictive Model for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia Among Average-Risk Adults in China.

Yan Liu, Yanxiu Liu, Yukun Feng, Boyu Liu, Wenxuan Yan, Nan Zhang, Youhua Lu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yan LiuShandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Yanxiu LiuShandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8278-8429
Yukun FengShandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Boyu LiuSchool of Public Health, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Wenxuan YanSchool of Public Health, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China.
Nan ZhangShandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Youhua LuShandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Funding

Collaborative Academic Innovation Project of Shandong Cancer Hospital TS001National Natural Science Foundation of China 72574131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the burden of colorectal cancer (CRC) continues to rise and current screening methods have limitations in efficiency and accuracy, there is an urgent need particularly in China and other large populations to develop and validate precision risk prediction models based on individual risk factors with improved discrimination and generalizability to optimize the allocation of screening resources. Asymptomatic individuals aged 40-74 years were recruited from multiple hospitals in China, between January 2024 and May 2025. All participants completed a standardized questionnaire, physical measurements, and colonoscopy. A multivariable logistic regression model was derived to predict the risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia (AN), and a scoring system was derived from regression coefficients. Model performance was evaluated using discrimination, calibration, and risk stratification ability. Among 9617 participants, 673 AN cases were identified. The final model included six variables: age, gender, smoking, drinking, chronic appendicitis, and hypertension. The model demonstrated acceptable discriminatory ability (c-statistics: 0.656 internal validation) and good calibration. A scoring system (range: 0-37) classified individuals into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. AN prevalence for each group was 3.46%, 6.25%, and 11.48%, respectively. The number needed to screen (NNS) improved significantly from 28.9 in the low-risk group to 8.7 in the high-risk group. The prediction model and scoring system developed enable effective risk stratification and are suitable for individualized assessment prior to colonoscopy in resource-limited settings, thereby improving screening efficiency.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerAdultAgedChinaColonoscopyFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsadvanced neoplasiaaverage‐risk populationcolorectal cancer screeningpredictive modelrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID42063357
PMCPMC13397183

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.