ArticleAffective science2026
Negative Hits Hit Different.
Article in Affective science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuroimaging of memory reveals stronger striatal responses to Hits (encoded stimuli called old) vs. Correct Rejections (CRs: lures called new), possibly because remembering old items is rewarding. If so, then Hits should elicit higher valence ratings than CRs whether one is retrieving emotional or neutral memories. Alternatively, memory may interact with emotion such that while positive and neutral Hits drive valence up, negative Hits drive valence down (relative to negative CRs). We investigated this issue in 47 healthy participants who encoded negative, neutral, and positive pictures, completed a memory test, and then rated the emotions elicited by each picture. Three main analyses were conducted. First, because emotional experience may reflect beliefs more than objective accuracy, we examined valence in relationship to perceived oldness, comparing Hits and False Alarms (FAs; lures called old) to Misses (encoded stimuli called new) and CRs. Second, reflecting prior work, we examined valence for Hits, FAs, Misses, and CRs separately. Third, we investigated whether the impact of Hits and CRs on valence varied with confidence. Identical analyses examined arousal ratings. For neutral and positive pictures, valence was higher for Hits vs. CRs. By contrast, for negative pictures valence was lower for Hits vs. CRs. Arousal was consistently higher for Hits vs. CRs. Positive FAs also consistently elicited increased valence, and effects were stronger for high confidence memories. The impact of memory on subjective experience thus depends on the emotional nature of the memoranda: retrieving neutral and positive memories feels good, but retrieving negative memories feels bad.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.