ReviewPreventive medicine reports2026
Smoking cessation intervention for Indigenous pregnant women: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Review in Preventive medicine reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To synthesize evidence on smoking cessation interventions among pregnant Indigenous women. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of databases from thier inception (MEDLINE, 1946; Embase, 1947; CENTRAL, 1991; APA PsycINFO, 1806; Informit Indigenous Collection, 1977; Bibliography of Indigenous Peoples in North America, 1900; and Global Health, 1973) to May 28, 2025. Eligible studies included trials targeting smoking or vaping cessation among pregnant Indigenous women. Interventions at the individual or community level were eligible, including education, counseling, pharmacotherapy, incentives, biomarker feedback, digital health, or community-based programs. Results: Of 5534 studies screened, five studies involving 723 pregnant Indigenous women from Australia, New Zealand, and the United States met inclusion. Validated cessation rates were low, rarely exceeding 20% across interventions. Three studies reported improvements in quit attempts and quit-date setting. All interventions were feasible and acceptable, particularly those embedded within Indigenous health services. Facilitators included Indigenous leadership, provider training, and use of culturally relevant materials, whereas low recruitment (32%) and retention rates (<40%), staff turnover, and variable intervention fidelity were identified as barriers to intervention implementation. Conclusions: Evidence suggests that although culturally adapted smoking cessation interventions are feasible, they have not consistently improved abstinence rates among pregnant Indigenous women, reflecting broader structural and contextual barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.