ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Urokinase for thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke: rationale and design of a phase I dose-escalation study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07047326 (A Dose-Escalation Safety Study of Urokinase for Thrombolysis in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Dose-Escalation Safety Study of Urokinase for Thrombolysis in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous evidence supports the efficacy and safety of intravenous urokinase thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), with additional advantages in terms of cost-effectiveness. Existing studies suggest that treatment response may be dose-dependent; however, current dosing practices remain largely empirical and lack standardization based on high-quality evidence. Establishing a weight-based dosing regimen is, therefore, essential to maximize therapeutic benefit and minimize risks. Objective: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of urokinase and to develop an optimized weight-adjusted dosing protocol for AIS. Methods: OUTSET is a prospective, single-center, phase I, dose-escalation clinical trial using a weight-based, rolling-six design in patients with AIS. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be assigned to one of four dose groups (15,000 IU/kg, 20,000 IU/kg, 25,000 IU/kg and 30,000 IU/kg). Urokinase will be administered intravenously, diluted in 100 mL of normal saline, over a period of 30 min. Outcomes: The primary endpoint is the identification of the MTD based on dose-limiting toxicity events, including symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, major bleeding, and other significant adverse events. Discussion: This study offers a structured, weight-based approach to determining the MTD of intravenous urokinase for AIS using a rolling-six dose-escalation design. By addressing the current lack of standardized, body-weight-adjusted dosing protocols, the findings may enhance the clinical safety and efficacy of urokinase thrombolysis. The results are expected to inform future phase II/III trials and support the development of individualized thrombolytic strategies in routine stroke care. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT07047326.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.