ReviewInvestigative and clinical urology2026
Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery: From percutaneous nephrolithotomy to the future of stone management.
Review in Investigative and clinical urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The surgical management of complex renal calculi has undergone a paradigm shift from traditional prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) to the more versatile supine approach. This evolution paved the way for endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS), a technique that synergizes antegrade and retrograde access into a seamless "four-hand" collaboration. This review explores the historical trajectory and biomechanical advantages of ECIRS, emphasizing its role in overcoming the limitations of PCNL and retrograde intrarenal surgery monotherapies. Central to this approach is the "intermediate-supine position," which facilitates real-time simultaneous operation. We highlight critical mechanisms such as the "transport technique," where flexible ureteroscopy displaces inaccessible fragments toward the nephroscope, and the "washout mechanism," which maintains low intrarenal pressure and ensures clear visualization. Contemporary evidence, including recent randomized trials and meta-analyses, demonstrates that ECIRS-particularly with miniaturized tracts (Mini-ECIRS)-achieves superior stone-free rates with significantly reduced morbidity compared to conventional methods. The technique proves especially advantageous for staghorn calculi and high-risk patients by enabling "single-puncture" clearance, thereby minimizing hemorrhagic risks associated with multiple tracts. Furthermore, the integration of robotic assistance for both renal access and retrograde manipulation is democratizing technical excellence. As we transition toward the era of "Fully Robotic ECIRS," this multimodal strategy is increasingly positioned not merely as an alternative, but as a leading framework and a strong candidate for broader adoption in appropriately selected patients with for complex urolithiasis, balancing maximal clearance with minimal invasiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.