Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42065927›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2026

Trends in Female Breast Cancer Incidence among Japanese, Korean, and US Populations: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis.

Aminu Kende Abubakar, Hasan Jamil, Hirokazu Tanaka, Kota Katanoda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aminu Kende AbubakarDivision of Population Data Science, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0009-8902-081X
Hasan JamilDivision of Population Data Science, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3483-5746
Hirokazu TanakaDivision of Population Data Science, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3153-8802
Kota KatanodaDivision of Population Data Science, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8687-1269

Funding

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) 23EA1009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer incidence has historically been higher in Western countries; however, rates have increased substantially in East Asia, with variation by age and generation. Direct comparisons between native Asians and their US counterparts remain limited. We examined the effects of age-period-cohort (APC) on breast cancer incidence among native Japanese women, with comparisons with Japanese Americans, native Korean women, Korean Americans, and US White and Black women.

methodsWe analyzed population-based cancer registry data from Japan (1985-2019), Korea (1993-2017), Hawaii (1988-2017), Los Angeles County (1988-2017), and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 8 (1985-2019). Women 25 to 84 years of age were grouped into 5-year age groups and calendar periods, and APC analyses were conducted using the NCI APC web-based tool.

resultsIncidence increased with age in all populations; however, the patterns differed. Native Japanese and Koreans had the lowest overall rates with an early-midlife peak, whereas Japanese Americans resembled US Whites, with incidence increasing into older ages. Period and cohort effects were strongest among native Japanese and Koreans, with sustained increases among women born after 1950. Annual incidence increases were highest among native Koreans (5.3%) and native Japanese (3.8%), followed by Korean Americans (2.8%) and Japanese Americans (1.6%), whereas US Whites were stable or declining and US Blacks showed modest increases.

conclusionsThese findings indicate an ongoing epidemiologic transition in East Asia and demonstrate how migration and generational change shape breast cancer risk across populations. IMPACT: Direct comparison of native and US Asian populations reveals migration-related divergence in breast cancer risk.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCohort StudiesEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansIncidenceJapanMiddle AgedRegistriesRepublic of KoreaSEER ProgramUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42065927
PMCPMC13320195

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.