ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2026
Engagement in Cancer Epidemiology Cohorts.
Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer epidemiology cohorts (CECs) provide key insights into genetic, environmental, lifestyle, and clinical factors influencing cancer development, progression, and outcomes. Engaging communities impacted by research and participants in cohort studies is essential for building trust and ensuring the success of these studies. While the concept of engagement in cancer research is not new, the practice of engagement is evolving towards more rigorous, bidirectional relationships between researchers and communities. Here, we discuss some goals of engagement in CECs supported by the National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, which include: (i) involving community and participant voices in study design and implementation, (ii) providing updates on study progress, (iii) returning value to communities and participants, and (iv) demonstrating appreciation to study participants. This paper also outlines opportunities to enhance engagement activities across cohorts such as expanding the use of digital technologies, continuing to share lessons learned, and supporting report back of findings. Additionally, strengthening evidence base on how to engage communities at all stages of research can foster more meaningful partnerships and ultimately lead to more impactful research and better health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.