ArticleCancer medicine2026
Predicting Prognosis for Gastric Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Treatment With Body Composition-Based Deep Learning.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study sought to develop an innovative body composition (BC)-based deep learning (DL) model to precisely evaluate survival in gastric cancer (GC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment (NT). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included GC patients undergoing NT from two centers. CT images both pre-NT and post-NT were preprocessed, focusing on the automatic segmentation of subcutaneous fat, visceral fat, and skeletal muscle regions using TotalSegmentator. Delta Radiomics features were extracted using Pyradiomics. After feature fusion and selection, the optimal model is Naive Bayes (Rad model). A hybrid DL model was developed by combining ResNet18 and Transformer networks for feature extraction. The Clinic_Rad_DL model was constructed by combining clinical features, radiomic signatures, and DL signatures. The ExtraTree classifier was used for the Clinic_Rad_DL model, while a separate Cox regression model was developed for survival analysis using the same features.
resultsA total of 356 patients (mean age, 59 ± 10 years; 264 males [74.2%]) were enrolled and divided into training, validation, and test sets in a 7:2:1 ratio. The DL model outperformed the Rad model. The Clinic_Rad_DL model outperformed both Rad model and DL model, with AUC of 0.915, 0.890, and 0.890 in training, validation, and test sets, respectively. The Cox proportional hazards model showed C-index of 0.806, 0.803, and 0.819, effectively stratifying patients into high- and low-risk groups with significant survival differences.
conclusionThe study developed and validated a BC-based DL model to predict survival in GC patients undergoing NT, offering potential for personalized treatment strategies in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.