ReviewJournal of gastroenterology2026
Selective IL-23 inhibitors in ulcerative colitis: current evidence and perspectives for multimodal personalized treatment: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The heterogeneity of ulcerative colitis (UC) results in variable biological responses. Although anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents remain a cornerstone of therapy, 30-40% of patients experience primary non-response, which is often linked to persistent activation of the interleukin-23 (IL-23) pathway. There is increasing evidence that the IL-23-Th17-neutrophil axis plays a central role in mucosal inflammation and treatment resistance. Phase II and III trials of selective IL-23 inhibitors for UC have demonstrated high rates of endoscopic and histologic remission, with safety profiles comparable to those of anti-TNF agents. These agents have demonstrated efficacy in various patient subgroups, including those with a history of anti-TNF failure. This supports their potential as effective alternatives to existing biologics. Based on these data, we propose a multimodal framework for personalized treatment selection that integrates three diagnostic pillars: (1) noninvasive biomarkers, such as serum leucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein and fecal calprotectin, to differentiate between systemic and mucosal inflammation, (2) the Mayo Endoscopic Subscore to guide therapeutic intensity, and (3) quantitative histopathology, specifically the Komagane subclassification of Geboes Grade 3, to identify IL-23-Th17-dominant activity. This integrative approach may enable predicting biologic responses, risk stratification, and the individualized use of selective IL-23 inhibitors. We propose this strategy as a model for generating hypotheses for future personalized medicine studies in UC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42068359What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.