ReviewTranslational oncology2026
Genetic architecture of multiple myeloma: From somatic alterations to germline susceptibility and clinical implications.
Review in Translational oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is best understood as a dynamically evolving genomic ecosystem shaped by inherited susceptibility, early oncogenic events, and continuous selective pressures. We propose an evolutionary genomics framework integrating germline risk, disease initiation, clonal diversification, and therapeutic adaptation into a unified model of MM biology. Polygenic risk burden, rare predisposing variants, and alterations in DNA repair and telomere pathways create a permissive background that influences precursor states and immune interactions. Primary cytogenetic events, particularly immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) translocations and hyperdiploidy, establish biologically distinct founding clones and constrain subsequent evolutionary trajectories. Disease progression is driven by secondary chromosomal alterations, copy number changes, MYC activation, TP53 loss, and structural rearrangements, promoting genomic instability and transcriptional plasticity. Longitudinal studies reveal branching clonal architectures shaped by treatment-driven selection. Integrating germline and somatic landscapes within an evolution-aware precision framework may improve risk stratification, anticipate high-risk trajectories, and support adaptive strategies to achieve more durable disease control. While polygenic risk scores (PRS) provide insight into inherited susceptibility, they are not yet clinically actionable for risk stratification or screening in MM and currently remain research tools. This framework provides a clinically oriented basis for applying genomic biomarkers to risk stratification, treatment selection, and longitudinal monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.