SynthesisScientific reports2026
Potential contribution of age-related and methodological factors to limited reproducibility in autism spectrum disorder blood miRNA biomarker studies: an exploratory meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cross-study inconsistencies in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) blood microRNA biomarker studies suggest that methodological heterogeneity may substantially limit reproducibility. We conducted an exploratory meta-analysis of publicly available ASD blood miRNA datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus, applying rigorous inclusion criteria and standardized analytical protocols. Three datasets were included (GSE89596, GSE67979, GSE222046) comprising 614 miRNAs across 90 participants (45 ASD, 45 controls). Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using Hedges' g effect sizes, with comprehensive heterogeneity assessment and leave-one-dataset-out cross-validation. No miRNAs survived multiple testing correction (Benjamini-Hochberg FDR < 0.05), though seven candidate signals showed consistent evidence with unadjusted p < 0.01 and large effect sizes. These candidates demonstrated near-zero between-study heterogeneity and consistent directionality across validation analyses. Potential age-related and platform-related differences were observed, with near-zero correlation between adult and pediatric effect sizes (Kendall's τ = -0.022); however, these two sources of variability were fully confounded in the available data and could not be separated. Some miRNAs exhibited extreme between-study variability (I² > 80%), indicating substantial methodological differences. Cross-validation revealed that excluding the single adult dataset reduced sign consistency from 89.9% to 68.9%. Our findings suggest that age-related and methodological factors, including technical platform differences, may contribute to limited reproducibility in ASD blood miRNA research, and that blood-derived signals should be interpreted as potentially reflecting peripheral physiological states rather than central disease mechanisms. A supplementary cross-tissue analysis using post-mortem prefrontal cortex data (GSE59286; n = 45) provided direct empirical support for this interpretation: the majority of blood candidate miRNAs showed no corresponding expression in brain tissue, with only hsa-miR-29c-5p demonstrating directional concordance across both tissues. These findings suggest that age stratification, platform harmonization, and cross-tissue validation should be considered essential prerequisites for reliable ASD miRNA biomarker discovery, rather than optional refinements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.