Evidence mapPaperPMID 42069881Full record

ReviewJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026

Follow-up effects of exercise-based interventions on physical performance in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Alexander M Brooks, Brent Cunningham, Madelin R Siedler, Sarah Burkart, Mark A Sarzynski, Nathan H Parker, Ciaran M Fairman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexander M BrooksDepartment of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA. amb91@email.sc.edu.
Brent CunninghamSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Madelin R SiedlerDepartment of Exercise and Health Science, College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University, Saint Joseph, MN, USA.
Sarah BurkartDepartment of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Mark A SarzynskiDepartment of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Nathan H ParkerDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Ciaran M FairmanDepartment of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePhysical performance impairments are common in cancer survivors and can limit daily activities, quality of life, and long-term health. Although structured exercise programs have proven beneficial for improving physical performance, maintenance of these benefits is unclear. This study aimed to systematically evaluate whether improvements in physical performance are maintained following structured exercise oncology interventions.

methodsA systematic search was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 1990 and March 2025. Eligible trials engaged adult cancer survivors in structured exercise interventions and reported objective measures of cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular strength, and/or walking capacity at the end of the intervention and ≥ 3 months after program completion. Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses with weighted mean differences (WMD) used to summarize effects.

resultsTwenty-four RCTs (2289 participants; mean follow-up post-intervention = 8 months) were included. Exercise significantly improved cardiorespiratory fitness at post-intervention (WMD =  + 1.76 ml/kg/min; p = 0.008); however, improvements were attenuated at follow-up (WMD =  + 1.24 ml/kg/min; p = 0.130). Similarly, upper and lower body strength improved post-intervention (WMD = + 3.35 kg; p = 0.001; WMD =  + 12.7 kg; p = 0.045), but effects diminished at follow-up (WMD =  + 1.80 kg; p = 0.081; WMD =  + 10.0 kg; p = 0.093). In contrast, walking capacity increased post-intervention (WMD = + 40.3 m; p = 0.002) and remained elevated at follow-up (WMD =  + 49.4 m; p = 0.006). Certainty of evidence ranged from very low to low across outcomes, primarily due to risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision in effect estimates.

conclusionsStructured exercise interventions were found to produce short-term improvements in physical performance among cancer survivors. Although gains in cardiorespiratory fitness and muscular strength appeared to persist at follow-up, they were attenuated compared with post-intervention and supported by very low certainty evidence. In contrast, walking capacity demonstrated sustained improvements at follow-up, though the certainty of evidence remained low. Future work is needed to identify longer-term effects (> 12 months) and develop strategies to better maintain improved physical performance. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: While exercise programs can improve physical performance, these benefits may not persist without ongoing support. Cancer survivors should be encouraged to continue self-directed exercise after program completion, and exercise programs should incorporate strategies to maintain longer-term improvements in physical performance.

Indexed as

Cancer survivorshipCardiorespiratory fitnessExercise oncologyMuscular strengthWalking capacity

Identifiers

PMID42069881

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.