ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation of the protective effect of direct peritoneal resuscitation on lung injury in a controlled hemorrhagic shock model in rats.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are severe complications following hemorrhagic shock, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) has been proposed to improve microcirculation and reduce organ damage, but its effects on lung injury have not yet been fully explored. Does direct peritoneal resuscitation with peritoneal dialysis fluid (PDF) reduce lung injury in a controlled hemorrhagic shock model in rats? In this randomized experimental study, 32 male Wistar albino rats were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 8 per group). Group I served as the control group, while Groups II, III, and IV underwent hemorrhagic shock. Group III received peritoneal resuscitation with saline, and Group IV received PDF. Lung tissue samples were harvested after 24 h to assess histopathological damage and inflammatory markers; Interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) levels. DPR with PDF significantly attenuated lung injury compared to saline-treated or hemorrhagic shock-only groups. Interstitial polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNL) infiltration and alveolar septal thickening were reduced in the DPR group. Additionally, IL-6 levels were elevated in the DPR group, suggesting a potentially enhanced localized inflammatory response, while no significant differences were found in IL-10 and TNF-α levels. Direct peritoneal resuscitation with PDF was effective in reducing lung injury in rats subjected to hemorrhagic shock by improving microcirculatory function and modulating the inflammatory response. However, the elevated IL-6 levels suggest further investigation is needed to understand the long-term implications of this inflammatory response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.