ArticleSystematic reviews2026
Physical exercise therapy for autism spectrum disorder: protocol for a scoping review of systematic reviews.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by core symptoms of impaired social communication and restricted repetitive patterns of behavior. Physical exercise therapy (PET), as a non-pharmacological intervention, has seen increasing application and research in the ASD field. Although multiple systematic reviews have examined the efficacy of PET interventions for ASD and associated factors, a scoping review is still needed to systematically analyze existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses, thereby identifying current research gaps.
methodsThis study will be based on the scoping-review methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley in 2005 and the PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. The search will cover four databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library (Wiley), screening systematic reviews published in English from database inception through December 2025. The study will include systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials and observational studies (with or without meta-analysis). Two reviewers will independently perform literature screening and data extraction. All eligible articles will be evaluated using the AMSTAR-2 tool. Tabulated data will be summarized through quantitative analysis, with qualitative synthesis conducted using narrative methods. DISCUSSION: This scoping review will highlight the evidence needed to guide decision-making for PET interventions in individuals with ASD. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JVM4H ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.