SynthesisMedicine2026
Optimizing riociguat therapy for pulmonary hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis of dose variability, safety, and efficacy.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary hypertension (PH) is a progressive, life-threatening condition characterized by elevated pulmonary arterial pressure, often culminating in right heart failure. Despite existing therapies, optimizing treatment efficacy and safety remains a clinical challenge. Riociguat, a soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator, has shown promise in managing PH, particularly in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the optimal dosing of riociguat to maximize therapeutic benefits while minimizing adverse effects.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Central, Embase, and Google Scholar was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing riociguat with placebo in adult PH patients. Eligible studies included double-arm RCTs with riociguat dosages ranging from 0.5 to 2.5 mg. Primary outcomes included changes in 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), and NT-proBNP levels. Secondary outcomes were adverse events and clinical worsening. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Statistical analysis used RevMan 5.4 with a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was evaluated using χ2 and I2 tests, and meta-regression assessed the impact of age and BMI.
resultsTen RCTs involving 1109 PH patients were included. Riociguat significantly improved 6-MWD (MD: 27.23 m; 95% CI: 8.28-46.18; P = .005), reduced mPAP (MD: -2.61 mm Hg; 95% CI: -4.60 to -0.63; P = .01), lowered PVR (MD: -90.27 dynes·s·cm-5; 95% CI: -119.30 to -61.23; P < .00001), and decreased NT-proBNP levels (MD: -256.77 pg/mL; 95% CI: -491.99 to -21.55; P = .03). Meta-regression showed age and BMI significantly influenced treatment effects.
conclusionsRiociguat demonstrates dose-dependent efficacy in improving functional and hemodynamic parameters in PH, with the 2.5 mg thrice-daily dose showing consistent benefit. BMI impacted functional outcomes but not hemodynamic measures. These findings support tailored dosing strategies for optimized patient outcomes. Further research is needed to confirm dose-response effects and address residual heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.