ArticleMedicine2026
A machine learning-based prediction model for in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with acute rhinosinusitis: A multi-database study using SHAP interpretability.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) is a heterogeneous catarrhal or purulent inflammatory disease of the sinus mucosa with critical risks in the intensive care unit (ICU). Current mortality models lack specificity for their unique pathophysiology, necessitating tailored prediction tools. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 3 large ICU databases: Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV-3.1 (n = 392), MIMIC-III-CareVue (n = 89), and electronic intensive care unit collaborative research database -2.0 (n = 78). We employed the Boruta algorithm for feature selection and developed 9 machine learning models using MIMIC-IV as the training dataset, with MIMIC-III-CareVue and the electronic intensive care unit collaborative research database serving as external validation datasets. Model performance was evaluated by multiple metrics, including area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. We implemented L2 regularization and grid-based hyperparameter tuning to prevent overfitting. SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis was used to interpret the best-performing model. This study included 559 patients. The Boruta algorithm identified sequential organ failure assessment scores and platelet counts as potential predictors. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the random forest model performed best in 2 external validation sets, with a maximum area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.799, and high sensitivity and accuracy. SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis revealed Oxford acute severity of illness score scores as the core feature affecting model output, with simplified acute physiology score II scores, weight, blood urea nitrogen levels in the first 24 hours, and sequential organ failure assessment scores also showing high contribution. This study constructed an ICU prognostic model for ARS using multi-database clinical data and the top-performing random forest algorithm. It aids in identifying and managing high-risk ARS patients clinically and offers a reliable tool for rational medical resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.