ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Bibliometric Analysis of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Radiology and Medical Imaging: A Focus on Deep Learning Applications.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents the first dedicated bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning applications in pediatric radiology and medical imaging, mapping the intellectual structure of a rapidly evolving field. A total of 2688 articles and conference proceedings published between 2005 and 2025 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection and analyzed using Bibliometrix R and VOSviewer. The findings reveal exponential growth in publications, from 7 papers in 2005 to 559 in 2025, with journal articles dominating the corpus (85.9%). The most-cited contributions, led by Kermany et al. (2018) with 2886 citations, are predominantly technical feasibility studies rather than clinical outcome trials, indicating a field that has advanced methodologically but remains in early stages of clinical translation. Thematic mapping identifies convolutional neural networks, pneumonia, and transfer learning as Motor Themes representing methodological maturity in chest imaging, while neuroimaging and image segmentation clusters occupy Niche Themes, reflecting insular development with limited cross-field connectivity. Geographic analysis reveals concentrated co-authorship along US-China and US-Europe corridors, with African, Latin American, and Southeast Asian institutions largely absent from knowledge production networks. Eight of the ten most productive affiliations are North American, highlighting structural inequities that risk producing AI tools optimized for high-resource settings rather than the global pediatric population. This analysis provides an empirical foundation for reorienting the field toward clinical validation, geographic inclusion, and methodological integration across isolated research communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.