ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Contraceptive-Induced Weight Gain-Myth and Reality Review.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The perception that hormonal contraception causes weight gain is a general belief that frequently hinders the initiation and continuation of effective family planning. This narrative review analyses data from Cochrane systematic reviews and recent pharmacogenomic studies to separate patient perception from metabolic reality. Analysis of high-quality data, including Cochrane systematic reviews, indicates that the association between Combined Hormonal Contraceptives (CHCs)-including oral pills, the transdermal patch, and the vaginal ring-and weight gain is not supported by consistent high-quality evidence. Placebo-controlled trials demonstrate that these methods are weight-neutral on average. Perceived weight increases in CHC users are likely mediated in part by fluid retention linked to the estrogenic stimulation of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS), rather than adipose tissue accumulation. Conversely, Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate (DMPA) represents a verified clinical risk for weight gain, showing a demonstrated clinical association with significant fat mass accumulation. Hypothesized biological mechanisms for this increase include hypothalamic appetite stimulation and glucocorticoid-like activity. The etonogestrel implant occupies a complex middle ground. While population-level data suggests weight neutrality, recent exploratory pharmacogenomic research has identified a specific variant in the Estrogen Receptor 1 (ESR1) gene. For the minority of women carrying this variant, the implant may trigger clinically significant weight gain, suggesting a biological basis for their subjective experience despite statistical evidence. Ultimately, the persistence of the weight gain concern is fueled by the nocebo effect and the misattribution of natural age-related weight trajectories to contraceptive use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.