Evidence mapPaperPMID 42073573Full record

ReviewCancers2026

Biomarkers with Therapeutic or Prognostic Applications in Gynecologic Malignancies.

Mohamed Mokhtar Desouki, Katherine L Mager

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohamed Mokhtar DesoukiDepartment of Pathology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.
Katherine L MagerDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesThe treatment of gynecologic malignancies has moved towards a precision medicine model with an approach to prognostication and management based on biomarker testing. The objective of this review is to describe the current landscape of biomarker testing in gynecologic cancer including clinical implications and the approach to testing.

methodsA review of the literature was performed that included published clinical trials which utilized biomarker testing as part of inclusion/exclusion criteria, prospective trials that addressed the application and scoring of biomarkers utilized in gynecologic cancers, prospective clinical trials that utilized biomarker findings to determine management, and national or society guidelines for the scoring of biomarkers and treatment of gynecologic cancers.

findingsThe use of biomarker testing as part of the management of gynecologic cancers is the standard of care for both treatment and prognostication. In endometrial cancer, biomarker testing has been incorporated into the staging system and impacts treatment in both the upfront and recurrent setting. Specific biomarkers of interest for endometrial cancer include estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), DNA Polymerase Epsilon (

conclusionsThe utilization of appropriate assays and processes to accurately assess the status of biomarkers in the pathology laboratory is crucial to the treatment of gynecologic malignancies in the precision medicine era.

Indexed as

clinical trialERFOLR1Her2IHCMMRP53PD-L1POLEPR

Identifiers

PMID42073573
PMCPMC13114698

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.