ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Component-Specific Advantages in Visual Attention Across Experience Groups: A UFOV Study.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Field-based and laboratory monitoring tools in aerobic gymnastics: a scoping review of measurement properties, physiological relevance, and change following training or competitive exposure.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Pooled it
- Visio-spatial intelligence in athletes: comparison of field hockey players and non-athletes.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual attention involves the efficient allocation of processing resources across space and under conditions of visual competition. This study examined whether experience-related advantages in visual attention are expressed uniformly or selectively across attentional components. Using a modified Useful Field of View (UFOV) paradigm, four groups with distinct experiential backgrounds were compared: table tennis players (TTPs), action video game players (AVGPs), aerobic gymnastics athletes (AGAs), and non-trained college students (NCSs). Subtest 1 assessed central identification under relatively low attentional control demands. No significant group differences were observed, indicating comparable basic central identification performance across groups. Subtests 2 and 3 assessed divided attention and selective attention under interference, respectively. In Subtest 2, all experienced groups outperformed NCSs, with no differences among TTPs, AVGPs, and AGAs. In Subtest 3 under high visual competition, performance diverged; TTPs and AVGPs outperformed both AGAs and NCSs, whereas AGAs did not differ from controls. These findings indicate that experience-related advantages in visual attention are component-specific rather than global, and become most evident when tasks place stronger demands on attentional control under interference. The advantage pattern shown by TTPs under higher attentional control demands was more compatible with visually demanding experience than with physical training alone. No significant interactions with eccentricity were observed, suggesting consistent group differences across peripheral distances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.