ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing (CD-CAT) for Adolescent Internet Gaming Disorder: A Conceptual Assessment Framework.
Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD) has become a major behavioral health concern among adolescents, yet current assessment tools remain limited. These tools often fail to capture the disorder's complex symptom variations and lack clinical interpretability. This study, taking an interdisciplinary approach that combines clinical psychology and psychometrics, summarizes recent progress in understanding adolescent IGD and the development of its assessment methods. We compare the diagnostic criteria of the DSM-5 TR and ICD-11 and argue that the nine DSM-5 TR criteria are particularly suited for transformation into distinct diagnostic attributes due to their detailed and actionable nature. We then review the strengths and weaknesses of Classical Test Theory (CTT), Item Response Theory (IRT), and Cognitive Diagnostic Models (CDMs) in assessing IGD. The review emphasizes the limitations of total-score and single latent-trait approaches in capturing the disorder's multidimensional symptoms. Based on these insights, we propose a conceptual assessment framework, Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing (CD-CAT), that integrates CDMs with computerized adaptive testing. Rather than presenting an empirically validated system, this framework offers a theoretically grounded proposal that specifies the key components, logical relationships, and methodological pathways necessary for advancing precision assessment of adolescent IGD. CD-CAT uses a system of attributes and a Q-matrix based on the DSM-5 TR criteria to efficiently classify IGD symptoms in adolescents, reducing the number of items required while enhancing clinical relevance. Lastly, we discuss the theoretical contributions of the proposed framework, acknowledge its limitations as a conceptual proposal, and outline directions for future empirical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.