Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42074120›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Cardiorenal Associations in Preclinical Modeling: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Magdalena Jasińska-Stroschein

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Magdalena Jasińska-StroscheinDepartment of Biopharmacy, Medical University of Lodz, ul. Muszyńskiego 1, 90-151 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6171-0733

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent years have seen growing interest in the relationship between the heart and kidney disease, resulting in the general term cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) being coined for disorders involving both the heart and kidneys. However, no accurate animal model exists that can replicate the specific cardiorenal associations characteristic of the human CRS subtype. Preclinical studies published between 1990 and 2024 were identified from online electronic databases. These were reviewed and subjected to meta-analysis according to PRISMA, with the quality assessed using the SYRCLE tool. In total, the review and analysis included 251 papers discussing the rodent presentation of cardiorenal associations, expressed by various hemodynamic, echocardiographic and histopathologic parameters, and selected molecular hallmarks. A wide spectrum of invasive and non-invasive animal approaches has been proposed for CRS. Numerous approaches evoked cardiorenal impairments by elevating systemic pressure. Among the "one-hit" models, Dahl/SS and ISO-HF most commonly resulted in cardiac and renal alterations mimicking CRS-2, while DOCA-salt or STZ were the most likely to elicit cardiac injury in progression of renal failure. The clinical relevance of "two-hit" animal models of cardiorenal associations merits another study.

Indexed as

Cardio-Renal SyndromeAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansKidneycardiorenal syndromeheart failuremeta-analysisrenal failurerodents

Identifiers

PMID42074120
PMCPMC13116581

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.