ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
TIPS in Older Adults: Reserve-Based Risk Stratification and Practical Approach.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a cornerstone intervention for complications of portal hypertension, including variceal bleeding and refractory ascites. As the population with cirrhosis ages, clinicians increasingly face the question of whether and how to perform TIPS safely in older adults. We reviewed observational cohorts, registry analyses, and systematic reviews/meta-analyses. Existing evidence does not support chronological age as an absolute contraindication; however, multiple studies suggest that advanced age is associated with higher rates of post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy (HE), early mortality, and readmissions. These findings underscore the need to shift from a binary "eligible vs. ineligible" paradigm to a structured, actionable framework that addresses modifiable risks and anticipates age-related vulnerabilities. Recent clinical practice guidance emphasizes comprehensive pre-TIPS assessment and vigilant post-procedure care, with specific attention to HE risk factors (e.g., prior HE, hyponatremia, renal dysfunction, sarcopenia) and cardiopulmonary reserve. In this narrative review, we propose an elderly-focused clinical pathway built around a four-domain assessment (Liver-Brain-Body-Heart/Kidney) and a traffic-light risk tiering system to guide patient selection, procedural strategy, follow-up scheduling, and triggered management of HE, cardiac decompensation, and renal dysfunction. This pathway aims to preserve the benefits of portal decompression while reducing preventable complications and improving outcomes that are meaningful to older patients, including functional status and quality of life. This narrative review emphasizes that outcomes after TIPS in older adults are determined not by chronological age alone but by multidomain physiological reserve. The proposed pathway informs patient selection, procedural planning, and early post-discharge monitoring in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.