ArticleMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2026
Association of Standing Sacral-Abdominal Wall Distance and Android/Gynoid Fat Distribution with Locomotive Syndrome in Older Women.
Article in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLocomotive syndrome (LS) is a major cause of mobility impairment and loss of independence in older adults. Abdominal morphology and patterns of body fat distribution are thought to affect physical function; however, their relationships with the severity of LS in women with osteoporosis remain insufficiently characterized. Standing sacral-abdominal wall distance (SAD) is considered an indicator of compromised trunk support mechanisms, whereas the android/gynoid fat ratio (A/G ratio) primarily reflects body fat distribution patterns.
methodsThis retrospective cross-sectional study included 221 women aged 65 years or older attending an osteoporosis outpatient clinic. LS was assessed using the stand-up test, the two-step test, and the Locomo 25 questionnaire according to official criteria. The most severe stage among the three tests was defined as the overall LS stage, and participants were classified into LS stage 0-1 and LS stage ≥ 2 groups. Associations of SAD and the A/G ratio with LS were examined using multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, skeletal muscle mass index (SMI), femoral neck T-score, and the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score.
resultsAmong the participants, 93 (42.1%) were classified as having LS stage ≥ 2. The LS stage ≥ 2 group had a significantly greater SAD than the LS stage 0-1 group (median, 167.3 mm vs. 154.6 mm;
conclusionsIn women with osteoporosis, SAD was independently associated with LS severity, reflecting mobility impairment from a perspective distinct from body fat distribution. SAD may serve as a simple and clinically useful indicator for assessing the risk of severe LS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.