ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Drug-Induced Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities: A Neurovascular Perspective on Risk Assessment.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnti-amyloid therapies (AAT) are reshaping the therapeutic landscape of Alzheimer's disease (AD), yet their implementation remains constrained by the risk of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA). Although the ARIA phenomenon is well recognized, most available evidence stems from clinical trial safety reports framed predominantly from a dementia-oriented perspective, with relatively limited integration of vascular neurology principles.
methodsIn this narrative review, we examine drug-induced ARIA through a neurovascular lens, highlighting how cerebrovascular comorbidity, particularly cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), influences the risk and severity of ARIA.
resultsWe critically evaluated how CAA comorbidity has been assessed in randomized controlled trials, focusing on exclusion criteria, imaging thresholds, and the resulting implications for external validity. Finally, we evaluated current approaches to ARIA risk stratification and proposed a more integrative framework that combines vascular imaging markers, APOE ε4 genotype, and key clinical comorbidities.
conclusionsA more tailored patient selection and monitoring strategies may ultimately improve real-world outcomes and optimize resources in the era of AAT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.