ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Bias Calibration for Semi-Supervised Continual Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In sensor-centric fields like healthcare, environmental monitoring, and industry, image classification is key to turning visual sensor data into actionable insights. Sensor-generated dynamic streaming data poses significant challenges for traditional static image classification models due to the continuous emergence of new categories, distribution shifts, and limited edge storage. With sensor streaming data facing label scarcity and high annotation costs, semi-supervised continual learning is essential, leveraging unlabeled data for incremental learning and reducing reliance on costly annotations. However, current semi-supervised continual learning methods rely on labeled data to generate pseudo-labels, leading to confirmation and relational biases. To mitigate these dual biases, we propose a Bias Calibration method based on nearest-neighbor semi-supervised continual learning, which integrates and adapts Confidence-Enhanced Learning (originally introduced for static datasets) and Guided Contrastive Learning. Specifically, the Confidence-Enhanced Learning aims to reduce competition among similar classes and penalizes low-confidence predictions, thereby generating high-confidence pseudo-labels for unlabeled data and mitigating confirmation bias. Guided Contrastive Learning constructs a pseudo-label graph and a feature representation graph, using the pseudo-label graph to optimize the feature representation graph, thereby improving class discrimination and reducing feature bias. Experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet-100 show that our method significantly outperforms existing approaches, enhancing classification performance with partial labeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.