ArticleThe Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS2025
Continuum of Care for Diabetes and Hypertension Patients During the Pandemic Era: Bridging the Gap.
Article in The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (HT) are chronic diseases with an increasing prevalence in Indonesia. Continuum of care (CoC) offers a crucial management strategy, yet its implementation has faced challenges, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examines how the Health Belief Model (HBM) construct intersects with CoC implementation in primary healthcare (PHC) settings under pandemic conditions, addressing a critical gap in understanding chronic disease management adaptations. Methods: A cross-sectional study, involving 351 DM or HT patients at nine PHC centres, was conducted between February and April 2021. Data collection included HBM-based questionnaires and structured patient surveys, analysed through descriptive statistics and path analysis. Results: Respondents were predominantly women (55.0%) aged 41-60 years old (48.1%), and with secondary or higher education (74.6%). A total of 43% reported self-medicating during the pandemic, reflecting behavioural shifts in care-seeking. Path analysis showed age consistently influenced all five HBM perceptions, while education was associated with three: perceived susceptibility, severity and benefit. Perceived benefit was the strongest positive predictor of revisit behaviour ( Conclusion: This study demonstrates the utility of HBM in understanding CoC adherence during health crises. The findings support the tailoring of chronic disease strategies by age and education, and enhancing CoC with digital technologies and expanded Prolanis programmes. Future research should assess the long-term impacts of HBM-based interventions on adherence and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.